Dental fillings fall into two buckets: amalgam and composite resin. Up until recently, amalgam fillings have been widely considered the superior dental solution. Amalgam fillings typically last longer than comparable direct restorative materials, such as composite. On average, most amalgam restorations serve ten to twelve years, whereas resin-based composites last for approximately half that time. However, with recent improvements in composite material science and a better understanding of the technique-sensitivity of placement, the difference between amalgam and composite has shrunk significantly. Now, it’s common to select between the two filling types based primarily on aesthetic preferences.
Dental amalgam has been a commonly used filling for the past 150 years, comprised of a mixture of mercury with at least one other metal. Amalgam has many advantages over other restorative materials, such as low cost, strength, durability, and bacteriostatic effects. It is relatively easy to use and manipulate during placement, remaining soft for a short time as Dr. Tate molds it to fit in the prepared area, setting it as a solid compound.
There are circumstances in which composite resin, or white fillings, serve better than amalgam. If more conservative preparation would be beneficial, composite resin fillings are the recommended restorative dental material. These situations would include small occlusal restorations, in which amalgam would require the removal of a more sound tooth structure and in “enamel sites beyond the height of contour.” The American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs has concluded that amalgam and composite materials are safe and effective for tooth restoration. Dr. Tate works one-on-one with all Route 66 Smiles patients to determine which filling material best suits their unique circumstances.